“Kos-Kosan Class”: Why Indonesia’s Brightest Young Professionals Are Living Like Students
In Jakarta, even lawyers and bankers are stuck in kos-kosan. Here's why Indonesia's housing market is leaving young professionals behind.
In cities across Indonesia, an increasingly familiar contradiction unfolds quietly after work hours. Young professionals emerge from high-rise offices and ride motorbikes (or ojeks) back to kos-kosan: modest single rooms in boarding houses with shared kitchens and shared bathrooms.
From the outside, these workers represent modern success. Full-time employees at name-brand firms; people fluent in English, with undergraduate (even postgraduate) degrees But if you peel back the curtain of professional respectability, what you often find is a housing arrangement more closely resembling a university dorm.
The assumption that this lifestyle belongs to students or underemployed workers is no longer accurate. The reality is that even “prestige jobs” no longer guarantee the financial ability to rent privately. Which brings us to a harder question: What direction are we heading, when historic markers of success no longer afford a person a kitchen (or bathroom) of their own?
The Rise of the Kos-Kosan Class
On paper, Indonesia’s young professionals are doing everything right. They’ve earned degrees, passed competitive exams, joined global companies, and secured roles once seen as gateways to financial security. The job titles are impressive. The career paths, respectable. But behind closed doors, the lived reality tells a different story.
Despite operating in fields that drive economic growth, many of these workers live in kos-kosan: single-room rentals with shared facilities, limited privacy, and often spartan conditions. It’s not a lifestyle choice born from frugality or a quest for minimalism. It’s a necessity, the outcome of a housing market that has priced out even the formally employed.
Middle-class wages have failed to keep pace with urban housing costs. For a junior professional, rent alone can swallow more than half their income. Add in transport, meals, and basic expenses, and there’s little left to save, let alone upgrade to private accommodation. If you’re not part of the growing class with inherited property or parental subsidy, you’re structurally boxed in.
A generation once promised upward mobility finds itself in a holding pattern, professionally mobile but materially stagnant. They live between two realities: the polished external image of LinkedIn-ready competence, and the quiet limitations of shared housing. What was once a stepping stone now stretches into the long-term. And with each passing year, kos-kosan living feels less like a rite of passage and more like an unintended destination.
The Housing Market Is Booming. Just Not for You.
At first glance, Indonesia’s urban centres tell a story of prosperity. In Jakarta, cranes dot the skyline, high-rises gleam under the sun, and advertisements promise “exclusive city living” and “investment-grade apartments.” The message is clear: the property market is thriving. But thriving for whom?
Much of the country’s housing boom has very little to do with people actually living in these new developments. Instead, it revolves around investment logic, where apartments are marketed as assets. Developers build for those with capital who can afford to buy property, leave it empty, and wait for its value to appreciate. This approach creates a city full of new units, but very few that young professionals can actually live in.
The problem isn’t that Indonesia isn’t building. It’s that it isn’t building for its workforce. Prices are determined by what the wealthy are willing to pay for potential returns, not by what a mid-level employee can afford on their monthly take-home pay. And there’s little to catch those priced out. There is no coordinated public housing policy, limited rent regulation, and almost no incentive for private developers to meet real housing demand at the middle-income level.
So the disconnect grows. You can work a “good” job, contribute to GDP growth, pay your taxes, and still find yourself priced into a kos-kosan. It's about access, and right now, that access is mostly determined by what you inherit, not what you earn. In a housing market driven by speculation, stability becomes a luxury, and the city belongs more to its landlords.
The Professional Aesthetic and the Reality Behind the Curtain
In modern Indonesia, appearance matters. A clean LinkedIn profile, crisp office attire, and well-lit Instagram posts are part of the performance of middle-class success. But behind this image, a different reality sits quietly.
For many young professionals, life unfolds in kos-kosan originally conceptualized for students, now rebranded by necessity as temporary living for the ambitious-but-unhoused. These rooms serve as a stop gap for those caught between economic ambition and urban unaffordability.
There’s no shame in communal living when it’s a conscious decision. But increasingly, it is not. It is simply the only realistic option for workers whose monthly salary barely stretches beyond rent and transport. And because the external image must be maintained, the internal discomfort is rarely voiced.
It becomes harder to admit the gap between how things look and how things feel. The professional may command a meeting, lead a project, even represent a global brand, but come evening, they use a shared kitchen, a communal bathroom, and a space where privacy is a privilege.
Staying in a kos past a certain age carries an unspoken question: Why are you still there? It is not asked out loud, but it lingers. The answer, of course, is rarely about effort or ambition. It is about structure, access, and a cost of living that has quietly outpaced the very professionals expected to anchor the economy.
The Inheritance Economy: A Meritocracy with a Map
Indonesia likes to celebrate the rise of its middle class, and in many ways, the celebration is warranted. Education rates are up. Corporate job opportunities have expanded. Young professionals now populate office towers, international firms, and digital startups. But beneath this image of earned success sits a quieter, more immovable truth: where you end up depends heavily on where you started.
This is the age of the inheritocracy, where your zip code of origin carries more weight than your GPA. A junior consultant from South Jakarta who lives rent-free in the family house can save, invest, and plan. Meanwhile, her colleague from a modest home in Bekasi spends hours in traffic or half their paycheck on rent. The effort may be equal. The outcomes are not.
This new class divide is no longer between white-collar and blue-collar. It’s within the white-collar workforce itself. Those with inherited housing enjoy a head start that quietly compounds over time. They can take risks, switch jobs, invest in themselves. Those without this support are often stuck just trying to stay afloat.
Even the freedom to chase opportunity is shaped by this reality. Relocating for work sounds exciting until you realise that rent in Jakarta eats 60 percent of your monthly salary. So people stay put, pass on better roles, or burn out trying to make it work.
Meritocracy still exists, but it’s heavily weighted. A good job can get you a title, maybe even status, but not always stability. Not unless your parents bought a house in the right decade, in the right part of town. In this version of the economy, your future isn't just built by your choices. It's also mapped by someone else’s past.
This is not just a story about housing. It is a reflection of a deeper structural shift, where the traditional markers of success (read: education, employment, appearance) no longer translate into economic security. The job may be prestigious, but the foundation underneath it is increasingly fragile.
Kos-kosan living is becoming the baseline experience for a generation of workers who were told that hard work would bring stability. Instead, they find themselves sharing bathrooms, budgeting down to the last rupiah, and measuring adulthood in terms of what they can forgo.
Indonesia has the growth, the talent, and the ambition, but it sometimes lacks the affordable infrastructure to sustain the people driving that growth. If the cost of urban participation remains out of reach, the promise of upward mobility will begin to feel hollow.
Young professionals will keep showing up, at least for now. But behind every salary slip, there is a growing question: what is this system actually offering in return? It’s not comfort they’re losing. It’s the assurance that success still means something tangible.
At StratEx - Indonesia Business Advisory we help companies better understand Indonesia (and other Southeast Asia frontier markets). Contact us If you're investing in Indonesia and interested in high fidelity cultural insight that you won't find in the traditional guidebook.