Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Antonio Specchia's avatar

Interesting. And true. Something many miss is the need of CVs that AI ready. I often see beautiful documents built up to impress a human reader. The intention is correct, but misses the reality: humans reading CV are disappearing. Machine do it in first place and, often the last chance. I believe job seekers should focus on content and forget the layout altogether.

A simple text document with clear narrative, skills pattern and how they have been learned. Experience and achievements.

We at Noesis Hiring created a ARM software capable to comprehend context and categories ditching completely the keywords matching of ATS.

But also this top hedge solution can struggle with beautifully layouts risk missing elements that may be relevant.

The good point is that our model requires applicants to verify and validate the cv assessment.

My two cents: save money, don’t pay someone to improve your CV. Collect on a white document everything you achieved, what you went through, what hurt you and what made you who you are. Each experience with more details possible.

Then ask Claude to organise it. NOT TO INFLATE. Just reorganise and rewrite it with smoother narrative and clear skill and achievements

Be sure to avoid stuffing with keywords, descriptions exaggerated and unsupported skill claimed out of context.

10 pages? Fine. 20 pages? Ok don’t think a person will feel overwhelmed by it. It simply won’t happen if the machine doesn’t get the clear picture by the document informs against mandatory requirements.

For more information visit Noesishiring.ai

The job market should work from the people to people.

No posts

Ready for more?