Nowhere to Hide: Who Really Benefits in the Modern Open Office?
As open offices spread, workers struggle with noise, visibility, and a lack of autonomy. The design says “collaboration,” but the outcome says otherwise.
Open offices entered the workplace promising to liberate us from cubicle farms and corner-office elitism. The pitch was irresistible: by removing physical barriers, we'd unlock creativity, democratize communication, and nurture a workplace culture of effortless collaboration. There would be no need for stiff formality or territorial behavior. Instead, we’d casually toss brilliant ideas across communal tables.
But reality arrived with less charm. For many employees, the promise of openness quietly morphed into a daily routine of noise, interruptions, and a kind of hyper-visibility that feels more like surveillance. Freedom from walls began to resemble a carefully optimized layout to track activity and minimize square footage costs.
Aesthetic upgrades mask the deeper logic. This isn’t just a change in floorplans. It’s a sign of shifting workplace values, where the illusion of collaboration often conceals the actual goal: fitting more people into less space, for less money.
“Designed for Collaboration” (But Also Maximum Cost Efficiency)
The open office was pitched as a free-flowing, egalitarian workspace where ideas could leap from one team to another without so much as a knock on a door. A place where marketing could overhear product, and engineering could chime in on strategy. It sounded brilliant.
But behind this pitch was a far less romantic rationale: open offices are cheap. Not “cost-conscious,” not “efficient,” just plain inexpensive. When you remove walls, doors, and private offices, you save money. You also gain flexibility. Rows of desks can be rearranged or expanded with minimal effort, which is perfect if you’re trying to scale or shrink without needing a contractor.
Executives love to praise the cultural value of these designs. Shareholders love the margins. The only people who seem less enthusiastic are those actually working in them. Because once the novelty fades, you’re left with the steady hum of conversation, the whir of printers, the clink of water bottles, and a sense that your brain is being leased out to the highest bidder.
Ironically, the thing meant to bring people together often drives them apart. Studies have found that workers in open offices tend to avoid in-person interactions, opting instead for email or messaging apps to preserve a sliver of mental space. There’s something telling about a layout designed to promote connection that sends people diving into their screens.
Transparency or Just... Less Privacy?
Transparency is a popular word in modern office culture. Managers say they want fewer barriers and more openness, but when you strip the concept down to how it actually plays out, transparency often looks more like constant exposure.
In the open office, everything is visible. Your work, your posture, your conversations, your body language. It’s a stage. People begin to adjust their behavior accordingly. You start curating your screen, your tone, your movement, even the timing of your coffee break. Not because anyone is explicitly watching, but because they could be.
This is about the human need for psychological safety. The ability to work without the persistent feeling of being under scrutiny. What gets lost in these transparent spaces is the freedom to make mistakes, think through problems, and speak frankly. Instead of openness fostering creativity, it can foster anxiety.
And when employees need space for focused work or private conversations, the environment rarely accommodates them. “Quiet rooms” and “focus pods” are usually overbooked. So you adapt. You take calls outside. You write strategies in cafes. You rehearse difficult conversations in your head, hoping to find a pocket of privacy later. But there is no later. There is only the beanbag near the foosball table, and the growing sense that your work life has been designed more for optics than actual output.
Egalitarian in Theory, Unequal in Practice
The open office often comes with the promise of equality. No more walls, no more executive suites, just a wide, democratic sprawl of desks. It sounds progressive. A space where everyone shares the same air and theoretically, the same influence.
In practice, hierarchy doesn’t disappear. It just becomes more ambiguous. Senior staff still tend to carve out unofficial territories. They’re the first to book private rooms, the only ones with consistent access to the few remaining quiet spaces, and often the ones who can escape the noise entirely by working from home. Their openness is optional. Their privacy, protected by unspoken rules and Outlook Calendar privileges.
Meanwhile, junior employees are left in the busiest zones. Their space is open in every sense of the word, except in how much they control it.
Power in these spaces becomes performative. It reveals itself not in who has a corner office, but in who has the right to be left alone. Influence is now read through email response times, access to decision-makers, and how many uninterrupted hours someone can steal from the noise.
The flattening of the office doesn’t flatten power. It only makes it more opaque. You might sit next to your manager now, but that doesn’t mean you have equal footing. If anything, it might just mean you’re always within earshot of someone who can evaluate your performance in real time. The walls may be gone, but the hierarchy is still firmly in place.
You’re Not a Worker, You’re a Node
There’s a quiet shift embedded in the design of the open office; one that moves us away from the idea of the employee as a person, and toward the employee as a node in a network. Not a professional with space, rhythm, and routine, but a unit of output, flexible and easily redeployed.
Hot desking is often marketed as a flexible solution for the modern worker. In theory, it promotes agility. In practice, it feels like showing up to your job every day without a guaranteed seat. The desk you had yesterday might be gone. The monitor you adjusted, the chair you liked, the sticky note you left... gone too. Personalization is discouraged. Instead, you get a locker and a rotating desk number.
This model works incredibly well for the company. It reduces real estate costs, simplifies logistics, and supports workforce churn. For HR, it’s a dream. For employees, it can feel hollow. There’s little continuity. Little control. The message is clear: your presence should be efficient, not personal.
You become a visitor in a space that was once your own. That’s more than inconvenient. It erodes the small but meaningful rituals that help people feel grounded in their work. The daily setup, the plant by your monitor, the sticky notes on your screen. They’re signals of belonging. Strip those away, and what’s left is an eerily frictionless experience, designed more for systems than for humans.
At its worst, this model borrows the aesthetics of startup culture and marries them to the logic of short-term contracts. You’re told you’re part of something dynamic, but it often feels like your presence is replaceable.
Not every open office is a failure. Some are thoughtfully laid out with a mix of quiet zones, shared areas, and enough flexibility to suit different working styles. When paired with a culture that respects boundaries and individual needs, they can function well. But those examples tend to be the exception, not the rule.
What started as a vision for open collaboration has slid into a strategy for maximizing headcount per square foot. Somewhere along the way, the focus shifted from fostering human connection to optimizing floor plans. The result? A space that looks progressive but frequently feels exhausting.
We know that our environment impacts our ability to focus, to connect, and to think clearly. When the office starts implying that stillness is laziness, that privacy is inefficiency, and that constant visibility equals productivity, it’s worth asking who benefits from that arrangement.
At StratEx - Indonesia Business Advisory we partner with companies to advise on end-to-end talent retention strategies. If you're interested in hiring more effectively, contact us for more info.