Indonesia’s FDI Drop: Don’t Panic (But Also Maybe Panic)
After a record‑breaking 2024 with $55.33 billion flowing in, up 21% year on year, and a healthy first quarter in 2025, Indonesia's FDI numbers seemed to promise momentum. Then came Q2, and with it a cold splash of reality: FDI fell 6.95% from the same period last year, the sharpest quarterly drop since 2020.
Almost instantly, the familiar “don’t panic” chorus started. Officials leaned on the global playbook, pointing to sluggish investment worldwide, mounting geopolitical tensions, and those ever‑present U.S. tariffs. All of this is true and undeniably relevant. But it is also a little too neat.
Yes, global factors always shift the FDI tide. But this isn’t just an unlucky quarter or a temporary current. It raises questions about trust, governance and credibility. Those three words are not the stuff of ministerial speeches but they are the quiet criteria that matter most to investors. A country can have glowing GDP forecasts, endless slides about “growth potential” and say all the right things, but if confidence in the system cracks, capital will quietly look for safer harbors.
Beyond the Blip: What’s Actually Going On Here?
First, let’s give credit where it’s due: the global investment climate hasn’t exactly been singing love songs to emerging markets. FDI dropped 11% globally in 2024 as companies across the world trimmed capital budgets and reassessed geopolitical risks. Southeast Asia, despite its appeal, is feeling the squeeze just like everyone else. But sharp drops like Indonesia’s in Q2 don’t tend to show up uninvited. They usually bring baggage.
Zoom out and take stock of what investors have been seeing, and more importantly, feeling.
The Pertamina corruption scandal involved oil adulteration and dodgy import schemes totalling around $12 billion in state losses. And it didn’t happen in the shadows, it happened at a flagship state-owned enterprise, the kind investors often rely on as a signal of how seriously a government takes oversight. When the crown jewel starts looking tarnished, questions quickly follow.
Then there’s eFishery, which went from unicorn to donkey in record time. At its peak, it symbolized Indonesia’s tech ambitions. Now, with accusations of inflated metrics and outright fraud, it serves as a reminder that hype is no substitute for corporate governance.
The prosecution of former trade minister Tom Lembong, widely seen as politically motivated, didn’t go unnoticed in the investment community. Combine that with the sudden rise of Danantara, a $44 billion sovereign wealth fund whose oversight mechanisms remain fuzzy, and the legal landscape starts to look less like a stable foundation.
Investors don’t expect perfection. Risk is part of the game. But what they need, more than high growth or natural resources, is a sense that the rules are clear and won’t change mid-play. Indonesia says it wants to be seen as a serious, stable FDI destination. But right now, it’s sending mixed signals.
Critical Question: Blip or Warning Sign?
There is a reasonable argument to be made for the “don’t overreact” camp. One quarter does not define a trend, and it would be irresponsible to declare a structural problem based solely on a single data point. Domestic investment actually increased in Q2, suggesting that local business sentiment remains intact and that the underlying economy is not in crisis. So no, this is not a red alert. But it is a yellow flashing light. And ignoring it would be just as shortsighted as panicking over it.
This downturn is, in many ways, a stress test. The kind that reveals hairline fractures in the foundation. And right now, there are three that matter most.
Concentration risk. Indonesia’s FDI flows are overly reliant on a narrow set of sectors and a similarly small club of source countries like Singapore, China, Hong Kong, and Malaysia. This lack of diversity means that any shake in confidence, whether sectoral or geopolitical, quickly reverberates across the whole system. When one investor sneezes, the portfolio catches a cold.
Trust deficit. High-profile scandals and legal ambiguities have chipped away at the intangible assets that matter most to foreign capital. It is no longer just about returns. Investors want to know whether financial statements are real, whether rules are consistently applied, and whether regulators can be relied on. These questions do not show up in quarterly data but they linger in due diligence calls and investment committee meetings.
Image vs. reality. Indonesia has spent the past decade branding itself as Southeast Asia’s next breakout economy. And to its credit, there’s a compelling story there. But the headlines have not been cooperating. When the promise of stability and transparency is repeatedly undermined by fraud cases, political drama, and opaque oversight, the narrative begins to ring hollow.
Investors may not walk away just yet. But they are watching. Closely.
Solutions: How to Keep the FDI Welcome Mat From Getting Moldy
If Indonesia wants to remain one of the top destinations for foreign capital, it has to do more than point to a growing population, natural resources, and a strong macro story. Those things help, but they are not bulletproof. When trust slips, no amount of nickel reserves or GDP projections can stop capital from flowing elsewhere. The fundamentals need a support system of governance, transparency, and credibility. Without it, the story unravels.
1. Fix the Trust Problem
Quiet promises and behind-the-scenes cleanups won’t cut it anymore. Investors want to see action, not spin. That means corruption cases must be followed through to their conclusion, with clear accountability.
The Pertamina scandal cannot be swept under the rug or resolved with vague statements about internal reform. If there are no consequences, there is no confidence.
The new sovereign wealth fund, Danantara, may be well-intentioned, but without independent oversight and clear disclosure mechanisms, it risks becoming more of a question mark. Global investors have seen enough headline SWFs to know when one is being used as a piggy bank rather than a strategic tool. They are watching closely.
2. Diversify the FDI Base
Indonesia’s current FDI composition leans heavily on a handful of sectors and partner countries. That’s fine in the short term, but over time it creates vulnerability. If prices dip or political relations cool, the investment pipeline narrows fast.
The country should be aggressively courting sectors like value-added manufacturing, renewables, digital infrastructure, and health tech, where long-term global capital is actively hunting for opportunities.
More importantly, it needs to open more doors to investors outside its usual circle: think Europe, Japan, and the Gulf, not just Singapore and China.
3. Tighten Startup and Corporate Oversight
The eFishery debacle stained the credibility of Indonesia’s broader innovation ecosystem. Investors are now wondering how deep the hype runs and how much due diligence they’ll need to do themselves. The fix is simple:
Implement stricter auditing, financial disclosures, and corporate governance rules for startups aiming for unicorn status.
Signal to foreign venture capital that Indonesia is serious about transparency, not just hype.
4. Send a Clear, Consistent Policy Signal
Mixed signals confuse markets. Right now, Indonesia is trying to pitch itself as stable and reform-minded while also engaging in politically murky prosecutions and behind-the-scenes reshuffling. That doesn’t work.
Indonesia needs to lay out a coherent, forward-looking FDI strategy and stick to it. Not just vague rhetoric, but rules, mechanisms, protections, and timelines. Investors can't live with uncertainty disguised as optimism.
Talk to investors. In real conversations, not just prepared speeches. Acknowledge concerns. Lay out fixes. Avoid brushing bad news under the rug and calling it “seasonal.”
Indonesia's fundamentals remain strong: abundant resources, a growing and youthful population, and a geography that makes it indispensable to global trade. These advantages keep it high on the radar for multinational investors. But foreign direct investment is not guaranteed simply because a country has potential. It is a deliberate choice by investors weighing where their money feels safest and most productive.
The Q2 decline in FDI might bounce back quickly. It could turn out to be a temporary dip rather than the start of a trend. Yet focusing only on whether the next quarter recovers misses the bigger question. This is an opportunity to take a look at the cracks the drop has exposed.
Relying on “seasonal variation” as the default explanation risks fostering complacency. Investors have choices, and those choices are shaped as much by perception as by raw economic numbers.
Ultimately, FDI depends on the belief that rules are consistent, governance is solid, and commitments are kept. Right now that belief feels more fragile than it should, and how Indonesia responds will decide whether it strengthens or erodes further.
At StratEx - Indonesia Business Advisory guide companies through Indonesia’s hiring, compliance, and governance realities. Contact us to understand Indonesia’s HR and business environment and avoid costly missteps.